Search for: All records

Various machine learning-assisted directed evolution (MLDE) strategies have been shown to identify high-fitness protein variants more efficiently than typical wet-lab directed evolution approaches. However, limited understanding of the factors influencing MLDE performance across diverse proteins has hindered optimal strategy selection for wet-lab campaigns. To address this, we systematically analyzed multiple MLDE strategies, including active learning and focused training using six distinct zeroshot predictors, across 16 diverse protein fitness landscapes. By quantifying landscape navigability with six attributes, we found that MLDE offers a greater advantage on landscapes which are more challenging for directed evolution, especially when focused training is combined with active learning. Despite varying levels of advantage across landscapes, focused training with zero-shot predictors leveraging distinct evolutionary, structural, and stability knowledge sources consistently outperforms random sampling for both binding interactions and enzyme activities. Our findings provide practical guidelines for selecting MLDE strategies for protein engineering.